Most longevity researchers are not trying to help you live forever — and no supplement has been shown to extend human lifespan. What experts actually focus on is extending your healthspan: the years you remain alert, engaged, and free from chronic disease. Understanding that distinction is your best defense against the myths circulating in the anti-aging space, many of which are, in the words of Dr. Sofiya Milman of the Institute for Aging Research at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, "inaccurate, if not downright dangerous."
Introduction: Navigating the Longevity Landscape
The longevity space is crowded with confident claims, and the people who study aging for a living are frustrated by them. "A lot is circulating in this space that is not science-based, and it's really important to dispel some of that," Milman told journalist Melinda Wenner Moyer for a piece collecting the myths longevity researchers most want retired.
That frustration has a long history. A scholarly analysis of extreme longevity myths notes that claims of remarkable lifespans have repeatedly collapsed under scrutiny: celebrated "longevity zones" in the Caucasus, the Hunza Valley in Pakistan, and Vilcabamba, Ecuador were debunked by objective scientific investigation in the early 1980s. As one researcher quoted in that analysis put it in 1986, "No single subject is more obscured by vanity, deceit, falsehood and deliberate fraud than the extremes of human longevity."
The pattern persists today, with influencers promoting peptides, resveratrol, NAD+ boosters, and growth hormone as life-extenders. Here is how to separate the myths from the evidence.
Lifespan vs. Healthspan: A Crucial Distinction
The single most important idea for evaluating any anti-aging claim is the difference between two measures. Your lifespan is simply how long you live. Your healthspan, as Mayo Clinic cardiologist Stephen Kopecky describes it, is the number of years you can remain alert, engaged, and active.
Scientists are deliberately shifting their focus from the first to the second, says Matt Kaeberlein, former director of the Healthy Aging and Longevity Research Institute at the University of Washington. Rather than only developing treatments for diseases like cancer, heart disease, and COPD, researchers want to make the years you have vibrant and worth living. Kaeberlein predicts that "an improved understanding of the biology of aging will form the crux of 21st-century medicine."
Why does this matter for you? Because a claim can technically aim at lifespan while doing nothing for the quality of those years — and most longevity researchers don't even want to extend lifespan as the primary goal. Before accepting any anti-aging pitch, ask which of the two it actually addresses, and what evidence supports it.




